Talk:Agenda0809
From Digital Humanities Wiki
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | From [[User:Amerune | Maureen]]: The suggested agenda items reflect my thinking that one of our top priorities should be to consolidate resources already available to us. If the elements of a graduate certificate exist on campus, and if such a certificate would give our graduate students training they want and can use to their advantage, we would be remiss in neglecting this opportunity. Undergraduate Honors College students working with humanities faculty on their digital projects -- as they already work with faculty in the sciences -- will be mutually beneficial, and has no cost whatsoever. We can only gain from a collaboration with colleagues from neighboring institutions, like [http://www.brocku.ca/history/faculty/jbonnett/index.php John Bonnett] from Brock, or the Blake Archive participants from U of Rochester -- and the range of collaborations could include graduate courses, training, and digital projects. Faculty from GIS attended our inaugural symposium, and the GIS-humanities connection is already being explored elsewhere. Open-source and in particular the OJS will surely be of interest to faculty and graduate students. Depending on the ways in which we narrow down (or expand) this agenda, we should identify internal and external funding and go after it. My two cents' worth. Please click on the "+" sign above to add your comments. Thanks. | + | From [[User:Amerune | Maureen]]: The suggested agenda items reflect my thinking that one of our top priorities should be to consolidate resources already available to us. If the elements of a graduate certificate exist on campus, and if such a certificate would give our graduate students training they want and can use to their advantage, we would be remiss in neglecting this opportunity. Undergraduate Honors College students working with humanities faculty on their digital projects -- as they already work with faculty in the sciences -- will be mutually beneficial, and has no cost whatsoever. We can only gain from a collaboration with colleagues from neighboring institutions, like [http://www.brocku.ca/history/faculty/jbonnett/index.php John Bonnett] from Brock, or the [http://www.blakearchive.org/blake/ Blake Archive] participants from U of Rochester -- and the range of collaborations could include graduate courses, training, and digital projects. Faculty from GIS attended our inaugural symposium, and the GIS-humanities connection is already being explored elsewhere. Open-source and in particular the OJS will surely be of interest to faculty and graduate students. Depending on the ways in which we narrow down (or expand) this agenda, we should identify internal and external funding and go after it. My two cents' worth. Please click on the "+" sign above to add your comments. Thanks. |
Revision as of 18:15, 27 September 2008
From Maureen: The suggested agenda items reflect my thinking that one of our top priorities should be to consolidate resources already available to us. If the elements of a graduate certificate exist on campus, and if such a certificate would give our graduate students training they want and can use to their advantage, we would be remiss in neglecting this opportunity. Undergraduate Honors College students working with humanities faculty on their digital projects -- as they already work with faculty in the sciences -- will be mutually beneficial, and has no cost whatsoever. We can only gain from a collaboration with colleagues from neighboring institutions, like John Bonnett from Brock, or the Blake Archive participants from U of Rochester -- and the range of collaborations could include graduate courses, training, and digital projects. Faculty from GIS attended our inaugural symposium, and the GIS-humanities connection is already being explored elsewhere. Open-source and in particular the OJS will surely be of interest to faculty and graduate students. Depending on the ways in which we narrow down (or expand) this agenda, we should identify internal and external funding and go after it. My two cents' worth. Please click on the "+" sign above to add your comments. Thanks.
